Before going on the route should take into account some tips that, by repeated, they are still important when we begin our journey to the holiday so precious.
Some recommendations sent to us from Argentina and Citroen Cesvi:
What we must not forget
| |
| |
| |
The emerging impact of these instances of risk often have to do with people seriously injured, severe sequelae disabling death always involve human suffering (the chronic suffering is not a mental category that has presence in the culture of Argentina, unlike acute pain generated exalted moments of outrage and solidarity transient very short term) and extensive damage (institutional, quality of life, coexistence, economic, etc.).
This component of our national character (the lack of foresight) is evident in many different orders of the passing of everyday life and institutional development of the country: the urban scene construction; environmental processes, the crime scene, the field of human rights (we do not expect the huge amount of daily microviolaciones human rights in times "politically normal" are the elementary particles which then clump together and hatch in the brutal rape), space health, education, law and justice, the scope of work, the scene of vehicular traffic, and so on. This paper is, very briefly, some issues of this last space.
Argentina, for many decades, is one of the countries with mortality rates from traffic accidents highest in the world, while over 95% of these accidents are caused by human factor problems, not failures soil or mechanical failure.
The average serious accidents caused by motor traffic has not increased significantly in recent months but, for reasons irrelevant to discuss in this article, the media have put the issue on the table in all its dimensions and, as often happens with the phenomena related to human behavior, it is possible that a normal succession of accidents with large numbers of wounded and dead, over-publicized by television, has created a kind of challenge and exacerbation in the drivers used to dealing with high risk, especially in young people driving private cars [1] . It began talking about driving murderers, criminals who also fled after being run over people, without regard for them .
believe that even the reaction of society, thus classify these irresponsible drivers twice, is not simply the emerging combination of two basic components of personality in Argentina: the aforementioned lack of foresight and irresponsibility [2] . None or almost none of these murderers drivers would be capable of intentionally killing another person, or even seriously hurt, the problem lies with the irresponsible and devoid of projections (then comes the loss of control, the dramatic crash and the second irresponsibility: escape and try to disengage from the Justice and shame).
involves the concept of responsibility to respond to the needs of others even when they do not explicitly formulated. Needs such as, for example, to live, the need for human beings who make emotional constellations of people do not lose loved ones, the need for people in that their partners or daughters or children are not victims of a serious accident.
But first involves every member of the country's population to respond to the needs of society and all people to attain full human development, to be part of a process of formal and informal education that do not become objects of the market without sole discretion, to the socialization process is not in the hands of an overreaching publicity seeking and antisocial behavior set alienating consumerism with exacerbation of irresponsible competitiveness seeks to nullify any person perceived as an opponent and before, ignore it as a human being as a subject of rights and as a neighbor.
In short, we are all responsible for the other members of society have the capacity to respond to the needs of the whole (which involves us) of citizens.
Here are some of the points founding core of the problem and the traffic scenario and the high rate of serious accidents that is generated in the same:
• All citizens should grasp from childhood that driving a car on public roads is not a right, but a concession of society and therefore should be totally covered for any problems arising from such consent.
• Driver's License, as shown and notes obtained through the Driver Registration (which includes the specific requirements that address impediments to the holder, for example, the use of lenses) class in its category B.1 (Law 24.449), enables you to drive cars up to 3,500 kg trailer without wheels, that is, the regular private car. Generally obtained from learning to drive through a workout led by a family member or friend, or in terms of a contract management course in the existing organizations for this purpose. In most municipalities in the country to obtain this license and the corresponding registry is just a bureaucratic process (only in certain municipalities also involves a physical or psychophysical) without requiring a driving test. The Directorate
Transit of some provincial governments and the Federal Capital also required the driving test, preceded by the completion and approval of a short course that gives the same theoretical distribution.
In either case, the person who starts in the car driving (if you developed the habits and reflexes necessary for the proper and safe driving a car with the acquisition of necessary knowledge) is able to solve any problem or difficulty in handling (a person or animal that crosses suddenly and in places not designated for this purpose, the rupture of a tire, out of the asphalt to a shoulder is not asserted, poor or reckless driver's operating another vehicle, a curve that does not have the angle and / or the depth to be expected, emergency braking, handling the rain, accumulation water or oil on the pavement, gravel roads, etc..) if your car is moving at a speed not exceeding 100 kilometers per hour (in the strict sense, you would type: not exceeding 80 km per hour). However, Driver's License is granted without any specification of the speed that enabled to resolve any unforeseen or at least most of them.
Those who know, strictly speaking, driving a car (and the number of these people is much smaller than is expected and, even more so, than those who assume that they know) have a clear understanding that, in terms driving the same car at 80 km per hour to 120 km / h to 160 km / h and 220 km / h are four totally different vehicles. The driver known only [3] the first ignores the conduct of others (even if it can handle) and whoever has the knowledge and skills to solve a problem only to 120 km / h not know how to do in the case of the other two, or no or theoretical knowledge, or habits, or the reflexes to save the problem to 160 or 220 km / hour.
Therefore, consideration should be given to potential drivers based on rates determined and this information should be included in the License and Driving Record. Of course, this license could not be given for exceeding the maximum speed allowed in the country.
• Argentina should not allow cars on the market that far exceed the speed limit in the country (130 km / h). Many of the brands and models sold in the country are standard units exceeding 200km / h. All cars should have a speed limiter sealing that does not allow the safe speed for the driver or driver is enabled, which should be seated in the driver's license is granted and the register that is provided. Paying the appropriate practical test, the limiter can be removed and changed in value km / h, seating novelty in such License and Registration.
• It is urgent that Argentina has a National Law Unregulated (unconditional or distorted by any governmental jurisdiction) to regulate all the problems of vehicular traffic and to establish a single licensing system and driving records, as established by the Single Bundle each driver and conductor in which to settle all questions relating to their performance as a driver or conductor. It is unacceptable that the irresponsibility of a court or a government in granting licenses and driving records involves injury to the resident population elsewhere. It is also unacceptable and irresponsible for a person who has committed a violation (very serious or serious) driving a car is invisible on this issue in all other jurisdictions or governments.
• No need to elaborate on details regarding Argentina publicity that allows manufacturers and / or marketing of automobiles. If publicly inciting to violence or the commission of an injury (ie, violation of the law) is a crime, the more you will be supported using psychological techniques in motivational research to drive young people. "To which give. " [4] the car and that carry high risk behavior, including, to defeat the demon.
Two factors or dimensions which handles the advertising of cars allowed in our country (this does absolutely nothing should care what other countries accepted) to install motivational processes that lead to the purchase of its products: the attractiveness of women and reckless driving behaviors [5] presented as components of the winning personality. Keep in mind that these motivational processes not only drive the acquisition of the product (which is specifically targeted to a particular brand), but widespread behaviors that promote high-risk management.
can be said without fear of error, that a significant number of car commercials propagated in our country are irresponsible and business tort from the point of view of the obligations that an organization has with the society that supports it, will agree, that have or install a company that sells dangerous objects is not a right but a privilege granted the country (or should give) in according to some forecasts and warnings. First are the citizens of all ages, their lives and their integrity as persons, the car, in any case can be placed in a second position of priority and rights (second place still sounds absurd in a hierarchy axiological rational).
In short, in most cases, we can not talk or think only in terms of driving murderers but irresponsible society to itself (which supports and creates that which then damaged and destroyed) and feckless governments in the exercise of their functions, thus ruling irresponsible to the citizens who employ them and pay them salaries while they do not think that being president is not a right but a privilege that society grants provided they are honest, effective and efficient.
